Cuisinart Chef's Classic Stainless 1-Quart Pour Saucier  Product Reviews


Cuisinart Chef's Classic Stainless 1-Quart Pour Saucier
 
Compare Prices From 2 Merchants
 
Average Customer Rating 3.4 out of 5 3.4 out of 5
2 of 5 (40.0%) customers would recommend this product to a friend.
Product Reviews
Overall Rating: 5 out of 5 5out of 5
Appearance: 5 out of 5 5out of 5
Workmanship: 5 out of 5 5out of 5
Written By: Anonymous
(The Old Dominion)

Customer Review
 
"I Actually Own it and I Like it!" Date: 8/1/2007
"I have to disagree with almost everyone reviewing this one. The balance is a bit "tippy" but Not overbalanced when EMPTY because of the small bottom area contacting the burner. This same quality allows the the pan to heat quickly on very low heat and it heats evenly and cooks beautifully. It also pours without dripping and works well as a small chef's pan. I use it to reduce, saute, and even stir-fry in small amounts. The lid from the I.5 qt. saucepan fits exactly. This ability to interchange covers is a benefit many Cuisinart Chef's Classic pieces share. Regarding handle proportion; Cuisinart Chef's Classic handles are individually sized to match and balance proportionately the individual pans better than ANY brand I have seen. This includes the vaunted and, in my opinion, highly overated / overpriced All-Clad which I do own! I usually cook for one and in smaller proportions so this pan is a perfect size. It is difficult to find good cookware in smaller sizes. Also, some points about this and all stainless cookware and the numerous complaints about sticking, burning and problematic cleaning I read on Amazon; Turn down the heat ( You don't need it! ), throw away that worthless and totally inappropriate steel wool and use Barkeeper's Friend or Bon Ami just like the instructions and all those smart folks keep telling Us. Lastly...How can Anyone rate a product and denigrate the design of same when they do not own it and have not used it and conversly, how can anyone find such a review helpful ?"
Overall Rating: 3 out of 5 3out of 5
Appearance: 3 out of 5 3out of 5
Workmanship: 3 out of 5 3out of 5
Written By: Anonymous
(Niagara Falls, Ontario Canada)

Customer Review
 
"Will be getting the anodized version.." Date: 1/18/2007
"Don't have this one but will be getting the anodized one. I hope it does not tip (balance) as the reviews outlined. How could the testers at CuisinArt miss this?"
Overall Rating: 4 out of 5 4out of 5
Appearance: 4 out of 5 4out of 5
Workmanship: 4 out of 5 4out of 5
Written By: Anonymous
(Fairfield, IA)

Customer Review
 
"Great pan! Great value." Date: 1/5/2007
"I use this one evryday and its an excellent value. The only problem is the pan tilting to the side of its handle, which is heavy, when its empty. But I have learnt to work around it. Great buy otherwise."
Overall Rating: 2 out of 5 2out of 5
Appearance: 2 out of 5 2out of 5
Workmanship: 2 out of 5 2out of 5
Written By: Anonymous
(Portland, Oregon)

Customer Review
 
"Poor design" Date: 11/19/2006
"In addition to the "tippiness" observed by the other reviewer, part of which is just a side effect of the otherwise-desirable saucier shape, the problem with this pan is that the aluminum disk is simply too small to make this a good pan for sauces, particularly if you are cooking with gas. No matter how small your flame, you get hot spots on the thin lower walls of the pan. Had I thought more about the design before purchasing I would definitely have bought the anodized aluminum version. It is an attractive pan and pours well, so my initial thought after discovering the poor cooking performance was to use it on the table for serving gravies and sauces. Unfortunately, the tippiness makes that kind of an unwise idea."
  1-4 of 5   Next Page 


Featured Stores
Home Depot
 
Overstock.com
 
Lighting By Gregory
 
Cooking.com
 
Lumber Liquidators
 
Home Click
 
Amazon